Comparing Administrations: Jonathan vs Buhari. The administration of former President Goodluck Jonathan and the current administration of President Muhammadu Buhari are two distinct periods in the history of Nigeria. Here are some key points of comparison between their respective administrations:
- Economic Policies:
- Goodluck Jonathan’s administration faced significant challenges in the economy, including falling oil prices and corruption. However, they implemented some economic reforms, such as the National Industrial Revolution Plan and the Transformation Agenda.
- President Buhari’s administration has focused on economic diversification, anti-corruption efforts, and infrastructure development. They launched initiatives like the Economic Recovery and Growth Plan (ERGP) and the Social Investment Programs (SIP).
- During Goodluck Jonathan’s tenure, Nigeria faced significant security challenges, including the rise of the Boko Haram insurgency in the northeastern part of the country. The government’s response was initially criticized for its slow and inadequate handling of the crisis.
- President Buhari’s administration has also faced security challenges, including the ongoing Boko Haram insurgency, communal conflicts, and banditry. The government has made efforts to address these issues through military operations and the establishment of the Northeast Development Commission.
- Anti-Corruption Efforts:
- Goodluck Jonathan’s administration was marred by allegations of corruption, with several high-profile cases coming to light. The government established anti-corruption agencies, such as the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offenses Commission (ICPC). However, critics argued that the administration did not do enough to tackle corruption effectively.
- President Buhari’s administration made the fight against corruption a priority. They launched the Presidential Committee on Asset Recovery and implemented the Treasury Single Account (TSA) system to promote transparency. Several high-profile corruption cases were prosecuted, although critics have raised concerns about selective targeting of political opponents.
- Infrastructure Development:
- Goodluck Jonathan’s administration initiated some infrastructure projects, such as the construction and rehabilitation of roads, bridges, and airports. However, progress was slow, and the infrastructure deficit remained a significant challenge.
- President Buhari’s administration has placed a strong emphasis on infrastructure development, launching projects like the Presidential Infrastructure Development Fund (PIDF) and the reconstruction of critical roads across the country. The administration has made efforts to attract foreign investment for infrastructure projects through initiatives like the Nigeria Industrial Revolution Plan (NIRP).
It’s important to note that these points are a general overview and may not cover all aspects of their respective administrations. The perception of each administration’s performance varies among individuals and different sectors of Nigerian society.
The administrations of former President Goodluck Jonathan and President Muhammadu Buhari:
Education and Youth Development:
Goodluck Jonathan’s administration prioritized education through initiatives like the Almajiri Education Program and the establishment of additional universities. However, challenges such as inadequate funding, strikes by academic unions, and a lack of quality educational infrastructure persisted.
President Buhari’s administration has shown commitment to improving education by launching programs like the N-Power scheme and the National School Feeding Program. Efforts were made to address infrastructure gaps in schools, although the sector still faces challenges such as inadequate funding and the need for educational reforms.
Power Sector Reforms:
Goodluck Jonathan’s administration launched the Power Sector Reform Roadmap with the aim of improving electricity generation, transmission, and distribution. However, progress was slow, and power supply remained unreliable for most Nigerians.
President Buhari’s administration continued with power sector reforms, focusing on improving power generation and distribution. Initiatives like the Rural Electrification Agency and the Energizing Education Program were implemented to expand access to electricity. Challenges in the power sector, including inadequate infrastructure and revenue collection, still persist.
Goodluck Jonathan’s administration maintained a focus on regional and international cooperation. Nigeria played an active role in regional security issues, particularly in addressing the Boko Haram insurgency. However, diplomatic tensions arose with countries like South Africa and Nigeria’s relationship with the United States became strained due to policy differences.
President Buhari’s administration has pursued an active foreign policy agenda, seeking to improve relations with neighboring countries and strengthen regional cooperation. Nigeria has continued to participate in peacekeeping efforts and engaged in economic diplomacy. However, challenges such as the xenophobic attacks on Nigerians in South Africa and disputes over trade policies have emerged.
Human Rights and Rule of Law:
During Goodluck Jonathan’s administration, concerns were raised about human rights abuses, particularly in relation to the military’s handling of the Boko Haram insurgency. There were also allegations of repression and clampdown on freedom of expression and the media.
President Buhari’s administration has faced criticism over human rights issues, including reports of extrajudicial killings, arbitrary arrests, and restrictions on the media and freedom of expression. Concerns have been raised regarding the government’s approach to tackling security challenges and the need to uphold the rule of law.
These headlines highlight different areas of focus and challenges within the administrations of Goodluck Jonathan and Muhammadu Buhari, providing a broader understanding of their respective periods in office.